Immigration In The US Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Immigration In The US - Essay ExampleThe constant acculturation causes a hybrid culture as both minority and majority culture traits are fused together while assimilation assumes a majority static culture that has to be adopted by smaller ethnic groups but discounts the influence of small ethnic groups on the majority culture.Pluralism encourages group diversity along with maintenance of group boundaries and can be seen as opposed to assimilation. Structural pluralism holds that segregated communities exist within the larger cultures who conduct social relations internally through and through localized institutions. In contrast, blanket(a) pluralism allows the individual to choose how pluralist one wants to be such as many people associate with ethnic traits and practices generations after immigration. The resistance by Euro-Americans is available as evidence of pluralism such as by marriage within local groups only.Transnationalism is the creation of combined plural civic and polit ical memberships, economic involvements, social networks and ethnical identities which link people and institutions in more than one diverse nation state in a multi-layered pattern. Immigration in the late nineteenth and earliest twentieth centurys created a back and forth movement of immigrants who helped move cultural values across borders through effective means of colloquy and transport. Such immigrants developed trans-local boundaries in order to protect the ideas of citizenship and belonging to their mother countries. Changes in the early twentieth century ensured that immigrants developed a plural indistinguishability in America and their mother states without fear of opposition. The present day multinationalism is far more diverse and encompasses private and public spheres of operation. Second generations of transnational immigrants display mobility in parental ethnic groups as well as in America society. The best method for immigrants to adapt to the host society derives through a combination of pluralism and transnationalism. Immigrants cannot be expected to revoke their ethnic, cultural and religious ties to the mother country within a few short years of comer in the host country. Instead the immigrants hold onto their identities in the form of transnatinoalism while the host society has to display pluralism in order to make the immigrants more recognised in society. The use of assimilation would on the other hand lead to friction between immigrants and host societies as a revocation of values is deemed indispensable for cultural integration. Do women have more to gain or more to lose from migration (for instance, compared to men)? You can think about this issue in terms of the causes of migration, the relation back difficulty/ease of migrating for women, the occupational and economic status of women migrants in the host society, or the impact of migration on womens social status within the family/household. Women resembling men stand to gain and lose at the same time due to immigration but their losses are considerably greater than those see by men.